Publication
The digital era has revolutionized cultural heritage preservation and research, offering unprecedented opportunities and challenges. Digital technologies have transformed how we access, analyze, and represent cultural resources, par- ticularly inscriptions rich in historical and cultural significance. This transformation not only protects these artefacts from physical degradation but also makes them globally accessible, fostering a broader appreciation of our shared heritage. Digitization is the first critical step in preserving inscriptions, converting physical artefacts into digital data for eas- ier sharing, analysis, and long–term preservation. Ensuring that these digital collections adhere to Linked Open Data (LOD) principles is essential for integrating data across various platforms and enhancing global academic collaboration. The Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) framework plays a pivotal role in organizing this knowledge in a machine-readable and human-understandable format. Our research focuses on compiling a structured vocabulary of terms related to Ukrainian and Armenian epigraphic inscriptions, forming the basis for a comprehensive SKOS framework. Precision and uniformity in terminology are vital in academic disciplines, particularly in epigraphy, where the study of ancient inscriptions intersects with history, archaeology, and philology. Clear and consistent terminology ensures effective scholarly communication and accurate knowledge trans- mission across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Terminological discrepancies can lead to misunderstandings and hinder collaborative research. This challenge is amplified by the linguistic diversity in global academia, where English often serves as the lingua franca. Translating and harmonizing specialized terms across languages is complex, especially for terms with nuanced meanings or historical evolution. The field of epigraphy exemplifies these challenges, requiring a specialized vocabulary that accurately reflects the artefacts’ characteristics and broader contexts. Standardizing this terminology while respecting linguistic diversity is crucial for clarity and consistency in academic discourse, ultimately facilitating a more integrated understanding of our cultural heritage.